Common sense seems to dictate that a fair and equal society will have all parts of society represented in the workplace, but that is not the case in reality. In Gundemir’s article focusing on ethnic and racial diversity, it is argued that the increase of ethnic minorities in places of leadership in the workplace not only indicates a progressive change in modern corporations, but in terms of the economic aspect, their inclusion is linked to a growth in creativity, an increase in quality decision making, as well as enhancing the company’s performance.
I used the template of “Common sense seems to dictate” to indicate the “they say” portion, since the article used several sources to back the author’s views and that only compounded the views on diversity in the workplace that we have today in society. I believe that it will be very easy to transition to the “I Say” portion after using this template.
Response #2
The readings from Gundemir et al and Austin/Pisano really do play a part in providing more evidence in my belief that there needs to be an emphasis on innovation as well as the prioritization of the diversity of ability within corporations. My reasoning for this belief is based on commercial competition, and if the leadership of major corporations are unwilling to even experiment with the idea of hiring neurodiverse individuals with extraordinary gifts because of a traditional sense of conformation, rival companies will exploit that and pursue this reformed approach, which will lead to their companies outpacing the conservative mindset of the former company. These articles, and more specifically the article by Gundemir et al, are similar to the “Why Diversity Matters” reading from the previous week, and I believe that articles with more examples of success with employment diversity will help a lot. Personally, I think that my experience studying in Syracuse allowed me to understand the value of diversity within the workspace, especially since my program included students from countries from Asia to the Americas.
It has become common today for diversity in leadership positions to be ignored and overlooked despite statistics proving that more diversity results in more productivity, creativity, and altogether, a much better atmosphere. For about the past twenty years there has been little to no change regarding this problem, which indicates that many companies do not see this diversity issue as it really is. Gundemir et al addresses the problem in the article The Impact of Organizational Diversity Policies on Minority Employees’ Leadership Self-Perceptions and Goals and mentions ways to potentially address it, such as Multiculturalism or Value-in-Individual Differences policies.
I decided to use the prompt “It has become common today to dismiss…” but chose to exclude the “to dismiss” part because I thought that saying exactly what was common better accentuated my point. The reason I decided on this prompt was because many of the others required more of my opinion, something that was assumed, or more of a debate set up. Personally, those templates did not appeal to me due to the nature of the article and how I interpreted it. I utilized the chosen template to state the problem and then used my next sentence to bring up the potential solutions Gundemir et al suggested. Templates are very useful to me because I usually get stuck writing when I do not have some form of guidance so I am enjoying learning more from Graff and Birkenstein.
3. The decisions companies make have the ability to impact everyone that already works for them and those attempting to get hired. Both the Gundemir et al article The Impact of Organizational Diversity Policies on Minority Employees’ Leadership Self-Perceptions and Goals and the Austin and Pisano article address the need for more diversity in the workplace, whether racial diversity in leadership positions or an increase in neurodivergence people. Both articles talk about how the increase in diversity in either aspect results in positive outcomes and, in many cases, increases in productivity. Specifically, from Austin and Pisano’s article we know that the reason neurodivergence in so important is due to the fact that many neurodivergent people are able to recognize patterns and certain aspects of their jobs that many neurotypical people do not pick up on. Unfortunately, due to the hiring process these individuals are more often than not overlooked because of the very rigid criteria that many neurodivergent people do not consciously abide by, such as difficulty interviewing, ability to demonstrate emotional intelligence, being a team player, etc. It is important to bring awareness to the companies that could really benefit from the inclusion of neurodivergent people and have an increase of diversity everywhere.
Something fun that happened this past week was that my friends from Syracuse stayed with me so I was able to show them around the Philly area and down the shore before they had to travel back to Scotland where they’re from.
It has become common today to promote diversity within the workplace, however, the definition of what it means to be diverse is fluid in understanding. Because of this, many companies have resulted in promoting diversity but fall short in representing individuals from all walks of life. In Guntemir, et al’s work he states that “in an increasingly diversified workplace, minority leadership is crucial to optimally utilize the talent of all employees for competitive advantage” he then goes on to highlight the disproportion between African Americans and their European counter parts in almost all positions of leadership throughout global workplace settings. The standard way of thinking about diversity has it that promoting diversity and or increasing the amount of people from a specific background (IE: people with disabilities, African-Americans, members of the LGBTQIA+ community) is effective in diversifying a professional setting. Although this is a crucial aspect of creating a diverse culture, making sure those very same individuals feel safe and accounted for by promoting equity within both the hiring process and throughout every other aspect of their career also has a substantial influence on the success of an organization.
Question 3 Response.
“Neurodiversity as a competitive advantage” by Austin and Pisano as well as “”The impact of organizational diversity policies on minority employees’ leadership self-perceptions and goals” by Gundemir et al, serve the purpose of constructing the definitions of diversity and its impact on organizational leadership. Gundemir et al delves into the broader spectrum of the affects of lack of diversity in a workplace and sheds light on the differentiation between the perceptions of diversity across the glob. SImilarly, Austin and Pisano focus their lenses on a the lives of Neeurodiveese individuals and what exactly should be done in order to make proper use of their talents. Both reading force the reader to question their own beliefs on diversity and the take a step back to view both a systemic and personal perspective of what forms diversity can take. Austin and Pisano and Gundemir et al both elucidate the need for the inclusion in order to utilize the skills of all members of a work place through the promotion of diversity.
In her article ” The Impact of Organizational Policies on Minority Employees” Gundemir has concluded that multiculturalism and value-in individual differences policies are preferred red by minorities because they make them feel safe in their environment as well as motivate them to do their best work. This conclusion seems valid when taking into account that in the studies conducted, minority groups were more likely to strive for leadership positions when they felt included and valued in their organizations, which also increases the overall productivity of the organization as a whole.
I included Gundemir’s conclusion as the they say and then for my I say I supported the “they say” since I agree with Gundemir’s findings. I’m not sure if I did this correctly since I didn’t see any templates for supporting the “they say” in the chapter. I think the framing is fairly simple to follow but I’m confused on how it would be formatted if we are supporting the they say claim.
After reading the articles by Gundemir et al and Austin and Pisano I am left with a deeper understanding of the importance of diversity and inclusion when it comes to the workplace. I’ve noticed that really intrigues me is in this weeks articles as well as last weeks articles there was a very prominent connection between diversity and the overall improvement of organizations. The article by Austin and Pisano was very enlightening to me. Something that stood out to me was that companies and organizations have been trying to be more inclusive to people with autism but then it was mentioned that there these accommodations haven’t been adapted to include people with other neurological abilities. I think that although these organizations are trying to take things one at a time, it is also important that they at least begin including people with other neurological abilities as well even if it is on a small scale. In the Gundemir studies both times the minority groups favored the multiculturalism and value-in individual differences policies because they made them feel more included and valued in the organization. This connects to the Austin and Pisano article because in both articles I have seen that when accommodations are put in place to guarantee the inclusion of everyone, then the organization will overall be more successful as well as motivate the individuals to do their best. Also I find it very important that both articles mentioned that diversity also means that you will have multiple ways to reach a goal since people will have different ideas based off of their own experiences.
I can think of a few ways that I am able to connect my experience to the bigger idea of diversity and inclusion presented in these articles. Prior to coming to SU’s campus, I was nervous because I didn’t know anyone and I also didn’t really understand how college worked because I am a first gen student. I was afraid that I would feel left out, however once I got on campus I soon realized that the school does a lot to make sure that each student feels included. I would always get emails about zoom events for the first generation students which allowed me to find a community I related to and have people I could go to if I ever had any questions. This did in a way motivate me because I realized that it was possible for me to survive in this new and challenging atmosphere. I honestly believe that if I did not have these people around me trying to help me, my first year wouldn’t have gone as smoothly as it did.
Highlight of my week
On Monday I had a picnic at Roosevelt Island with my sister and cousin. We also went and got ice cream from Surreal Creamery afterwards. Sadly I didn’t take any pictures but I had a really fun time.
In “The Impact of Organizational Diversity Policies on Minority Employees’ Leadership Self-Perceptions and Goals,” Seval Gundemir and her coauthors argue that organizations should consider implementing diversity policies that openly acknowledge differences as a way to foster an organizational climate where minority employees feel empowered to pursue leadership roles. Based on their research, they advocate for diversity policies that acknowledge multiculturalism and individual differences as core values over colorblind policies that de-emphasize differences.
After reviewing the different template ideas in Graff and Birkenstein, I decided to go with a more conventional opening that summarized Gundemir et al’s argument all in one sentence. This took me a long time and it ended up being a very long sentence, but I think it captures what “they say” broadly. After reading it over a few times, I felt it needed a little more detail, so I wrote a second sentence that provided more “they say” specifics about their conclusions. I can see how this framing technique will be very useful to my writing. I feel I could easily transition from this opening to the “I say” part of an essay by using a next sentence that would start with something like “While these conclusions are insightful, I believe…”
Response to #3
The Gundemir et al and Austin and Pisano articles discuss ways of increasing the diversity of organizations and ways of creating more opportunities for minorities or people with differences. Ideally this will lead to opportunities in specific organizations, as well as ripple out to society as a whole. This is important research, but Gundemir et al base their conclusions on sterile experiments using volunteers and fictional companies, while Austin and Pisano highlight real companies that are taking new ideas and putting them immediately into practice in real work environments. I would say that their ideas matter but to different audiences. The Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies is read by other researchers, while Harvard Business Review is read by managers looking for tools to use.
Gundemir et al’s research may lead to ripple effects for society, but I don’t think the impact will happen as quickly as society needs. Gundemir et al begin their article by discussing the amount of time that has passed with little progress on diversity, but then they design a research study that will require organizations to change mission statements and policies which could take years to implement. After the new policies are approved, I can’t see how employees will rapidly change their behaviors and attitudes. When it comes to business practices, I think companies are more likely to adopt what is working in another company, rather than adopt what academic researchers have concluded in a hypothetical situation.
Highlight from my week
California lifted its mask mandate June 15, and I went to the gym for the first time without wearing one. I could actually breathe on the treadmill!
While they rarely admit as much, companies often take for granted that anyone in their company can be appointed to a high level leadership position.
After reading Gundemir et al’s argument, I did not see much of a “they say” side because the facts are all there. Not to mention the notion that people should not be discriminated for anything about them that might be different. However, after reading through the templates from the first chapter of They Say, I Say, I found it to be much easier to form an argumentative sentence. The templates are a good way to put ideas into words if one was struggling to do so. I also feel like there is still room to put my own writing style or use of language into the templates. There is no reason why I can’t change one or two of the words here or there, or even put the entire sentence into my own writing. I found the templates helped me not only form the sentence but it actually helped me see the other side of the argument.
2.
Both of these readings have broadened my understanding of diversity in organizations through the use of their statistics mainly. They supported the ideas discussed in the texts from last week and expanded the ideas and claims that were stated. As it has been proven through a few of the articles, having a diversity of people working together is beneficial a few different ways. It is beneficial for the success of the company, but it is also beneficial for the workers. As Gundemir explained and proved, it is beneficial for the comfort and confidence of the workers who have faced discrimination.
Austin and Pisano expanded on the idea that having a diverse group of people working together can be beneficial for the company. It can allow for another way for companies to add a competitive nature to their company and workforce. With that, adds to how it can be beneficial for the success of the company. As I explained in my last post, I believe that one reason it helps is that there are different people with different experiences and different ideas working together to achieve the same goal. Combine that with the competitive nature that Austin and Pisano elaborated on, and the company’s success goes up even higher.
A highlight from my week was I did very well on my math midterm that I had on Wednesday and I had spent a lot of time preparing for it.
Testing out my first template from the TSIS article sounds interesting, as it will allow me the opportunity to apply some of the templates discussed in the book. In my experience when writing, there are often many different statistics, thoughts and information that are discussed throughout one single article. In my writing I have the issue of going in many different directions, so I believe that this template will be beneficial. For reference, I will be using the template noted in chapter 1 of the TSIS, as well as the intro for the I say part.
Many people assume that certain policies fit the needs of all individuals within the organization. Gundemir, a postdoctoral research scholar at Columbia Business school examines how this is not the case, as organizational diversity policies have an impact on many minority employees personal as well as professional goals. In her study, she examines how organizations’ diversity policies have an impact on both minority employees’ personal as well as professional aspirations. I agree with Gundemirs conclusion that organizational diversity policies are essential in moving towards an increased number and percentage of minorities in leadership roles. Along with this, by creating a more welcoming environment, new goals are set and the organization becomes more productive as a result.
This was my first attempt at using the template, so I would appreciate any feedback. I felt like at the end I began to go off format. I found it really difficult to stick with the format, as I usually like to write all of my thoughts down, and then go back and edit them. I had trouble figuring out how to use the template in an effective way, as it took a considerable amount of time for me to decide which template to use.
Response to #2
The two readings both spoke towards the need of changing policies within organizations. More specifically, in the past and even currently, many organizations use blanket policies, whereas they should be altering their policies and creating new policies to cater to the needs of different individuals. Often when I think of diversity I think of sexual preferences, race and gender. Pisanos article helped me realize that there are many other different ways that an individual can be considered diverse, for example, being neurodiverse. Just as there are many ways to define or describe organizational culture, there are many different ways to categorize or describe diversity.
Austin and Pisano also discuss why having neurodiverse individuals is beneficial for the organization. Some of the benefits include increased productivity, availability of more direct communication with employees, along with creating benefits pertaining to the reputation of the organization in general. Many STEM companies also recognize the benefits of having neurodiverse employees (ex: ability to recognize patterns with numbers), just as others recognize the importance for ethnic and gender diversity. All diverse employees offer different perspectives, ways to approach problems, or even ideas surrounding a specific topic. These different perspectives allow for unique solutions to problems or projects which may be beneficial towards the organization as a whole. The article on why diversity is important recognized this as well, however they focused on gender and ethnic diversity.
When I thought about how all of the different articles we have read are connected, it fascinated me. It also made me realize that everything is connected, and it is important to analyze different elements within the organization, whether it be from a human resource perspective, or from designing new policies for the organization. It is all important and plays a critical role in not only the professional aspect for employees, but also their personal lives.
I have found that in my time at Syracuse, hearing different perspectives from people is always interesting. Whether they are on the east or west coast in the United States, or living in Asia, every person that I have encountered has always offered a unique view on how to approach a group project, or sharing about their own experiences. Being considerate of others and encouraging people to share their differences allows for me to personally think about all of the different ways that there are to approach projects.
Highlight of my week
This week I went on a hike. I took a picture of a poison dart frog, they are very rare and hard to see so I was excited when I saw it. They are also fluorescent.
The alarming statistics detailing the underrepresentation of minorities in organizational leadership positions has led to several researchers exploring possible solutions to this problem. In the article “The Impact of Organizational Diversity Policies on Minority Employees’ Leadership Self-Perceptions and Goals”, study authors Gündemir, et al conclude that implementing diversity policies that emphasize multiculturism or value individual differences leads to minority employees having positive perceptions of themselves as leaders within their organization. By extension, it was further implied that this could help decrease low minority representation in organizational leadership positions. One might argue however, that the studies they based their conclusions on were flawed. The study results hinged on data obtained from fictional scenarios rather than real life experiences. Although the authors did not say so directly, the framing of the study findings also hinted that to a certain extent, a minority’s level of desire to be a leader in an organization is a measure of the likelihood of being promoted into leadership positions. This is a faulty argument in so much as it does not factor in real world biases that may exist in a company that has a diversity policy in writing but not in practice.
If you notice, the statement above begins with a summary of what “they say” so as not to make the reader wait to find out about the purpose of the piece. The statement also makes use of the “they say/I say” approach. Furthermore, a variation of the template language, “Although X does not say so directly,” has been implemented. Although I naturally use some of Graff and Birkenstein’s approaches, I find that its advantageous to have a guide like “They Say, I Say” to refer to in order to help keep one’s writing in top form!
Response to #2
After reading several articles about diversity and organizational culture, I find myself attaining a deeper realization that achieving diversity in an organization is a multilayered undertaking. In Gündemir’s, et, al, article, “The Impact of Organizational Diversity Policies on Minority Employees’ Leadership Self-Perception and Goals”, we get a peek into how some people, once assigned a minority designation, might view themselves in the context of their status within an organization. While authors Robert D. Austin and Gary P. Pisano’s “Neurodiversity as a Competitive Advantage” offer us a view into real world solutions (unlike Gündemir’s, et, al study which was based on hypothetical situations) for achieving neurodiversity in an organization.
The most eye-opening element about both articles is how diversity is highlighted as a competitive advantage. Since I now have access to data I didn’t previously, I possess a more complete picture of the concrete benefits of DEI. I thought Austin and Pisano’s article was quite illuminating because it provided particulars on a well thought out model for realizing neurodiversity in the workplace. This brought to mind the statistics in “Why Diversity Matters”, Vivian Hunt, et, al. On one hand it seems that there has been lots of research on racial and ethnic diversity in the workplace but not very much implementation of the findings from the research. On the other hand, it appears that as a result of a consulting firm’s dedication to transforming practices and attitudes regarding neurodiversity, much more effort has gone into reaching parity for differently abled employees than for racial and ethnic minority employees.
I started to wonder if perhaps people need some sort of personal experience to truly advocate for reform, rather than just doing “what’s right”. Thorkil Sonne, the founder of Danish company Specialisterne, started his consulting company as a direct result of his child being diagnosed with autism. He was motivated to disrupt current practices in order to provide more opportunities for his child. I can attest that personal experience can propel change. I was driven to become a union leader because I had been assisted by the union and had a positive outcome. Consequently, I decided to pay it forward and do the same for others. I am inspired by Specialistern’s model. I’ve learned that innovation along with personal motivation is a great vehicle for executing real change.
Highlight of my week
My family and I spent time at a nature preserve that was once the personal estate of a member of the Guggenheim family. The property has wooded areas, open meadows and a beach!
I was very eager to test out my first template from “They say/I say,” especially by referring to Gundemir et al.’s arguments since there was an abundance of information to unpack. I was excited to test myself because I sometimes can get overwhelmed trying to word a clear point that is in my head. I ended up using the templates for introducing what “they say.” My attempt reads, “It has become common today to dismiss the short term and long term effects of diversity policies on minorities in the workforce. In his recent work, Gundemir has offered harsh critiques through studies of how diversity policies decide employees’ self-perceptions as well as career views in hopes for formal social systems in career-based settings.” I created these sentences by first making a general statement regarding something I believe is overlooked regarding Gundemir’s studies. However, I kept my view in a “they say” format by acknowledging that this point refers to Gundemir’s work with the sentence to follow. I then wrote what Gundemir’s work refers to and why he is doing so. Using this template allowed me to configure another person’s words with a good amount of information into a straightforward sentence with a clear argument. I had to read it over many times because since it is a template, I wanted to make sure everything was in the right order and that information flowed the way I wanted it to.
Response to #2
Both readings attempt re-evaluation and change of policies as a means of benefitting diverse employees as well as business growth and strength. Implementing diversity policies and reconfiguring career development policies and recruitment would affect not only a company’s strength but also the well-being and highest potential of employee talent. Commonalities between both articles include real-life results regarding physical people and their benefits. Gundemir acquires studies to represent this, and Pisano contributes information from real companies that have successfully leveraged all employees’ talents. A similarity between all articles includes the benefits of introducing and implementing diversity in the workforce and how opportunities are introduced not only for companies but employees. Gundemir’s article explains how employees’ eagerness to do well in a company due to its inclusivity can spark a personal strive to do the best. In Pisano’s article, it states that hiring neurodiverse employees allows for new perspectives and solutions that without a doubt would make these employees feel safe, recognized, and eager to stay with these companies and do the best work for them. My mom actually works at SAP and tells me about this all the time. I remember years ago, when the company was fairly new, overhearing a meeting regarding how to successfully create a way for employees to get to know each other better and connect. I remember loving this idea; since growing up, I always believed that employees, especially from a sales perspective, were out for their own personal benefits. Both articles and the reading from last week really give me hope when it comes to inclusivity and dissing the notion of selfish individuality in the workforce.
Highlight of my week
This weekend I was able to travel to NYC for my friends birthday. I traveled by train and ran into an old friend in the train station on the way back. My train was actually running behind and she happened to be on the same one, so we were able to grab a bite to eat before leaving. Sometimes a late train can be a good thing!
Now that we’ve gotten to know each other a bit and have gotten our feet wet, so to speak, in what organizational culture and diversity & inclusion efforts are all about, we’re going to spend this week deepening our knowledge of those topics AND beginning to think about some writerly concerns.
In this post, I’ll lay out a little more info about the week’s assignments and point you toward some additional resources that will help you to complete those tasks. Please read on for more.
Reading assignments
“The impact of organizational diversity policies on minority employees’ leadership self-perceptions and goals” by Gundemir et al (you will use SUMMON on the library website to locate and download this article)
“Neurodiversity as a competitive advantage” by Austin & Pisano (on Blackboard)
chapter 1 “They Say” of They Say/I Say
Writing/discussion assignments
100-200 word summary of Gundemir et al (working with the guidance from the handout on summary, on Bb and in the blog post linked below) [due Weds., 6/16 through Bb]
200-300 word comparison of Gundemir and Austin & Pisano article, focusing on how the pieces differ in author, audience, purpose, and approach [due Sunday, 6/20 through Bb]
discussion posts in response to this week’s prompts [due Saturday, 6/19]. See this post for details
Check out these additional resources
read through thisblog post (and check out the embedded links) for some more background on genre and summary
read over the Close Reading handout linked below and also available on Blackboard (click on the Handouts tab there)
