Week of 7/27 Discussion

This powerpoint is similar to the style of powerpoint I’m doing for my Research Project, with a similar audience. The topic is on how to safely return to schools after closures from coronavirus. It’s an informative powerpoint for students and teachers, with a writing style similar to what mine is for my project. I really like the layout of this powerpoint and its integration into the website. It looks extremely professional and well done, and the writing is all very professional. What I can take from this powerpoint and bring into my own is the layout for how the powerpoint progresses. The slides are simple and ask simple questions and provide simple answers. What’s different about this one from mine is it’s more of an interact style of powerpoint, simply just due to the fact corona would prevent it from actually being presented to anyone. I want to use its simple style, and utilizing single-word slides for my own project like this one, because I think it does a good job of engaging the audience.

Week of 7/20 Discussion

  1. In How To Create A Culture Manifesto for Your Organization (And Why It’s a Good Idea), Mollie West compiles the mission statements from various companies and how they used them, in order to convince readers of the importance of Culture Manifestos. She makes the strengths and uses of the company’s manifestos clear though laying them out in bullet points. She goes back and forth between her own analysis of the manifestos, and information on the manifestos themselves. The companies are laid out in different sections in bold underline and make it easy for readers to scroll through them and read her reasoning why they’re effective. She aims to reach an audience with influence in companies in order to help influence their systems with her recommendations.
  2. In analyzing West’s article for her target audience and her style she uses to reach them, I’ve thought about what type of audience I would like to reach with my research project and why. Because college is the stepping stone into the real world, and college graduates will have a great influence on the world they step into after college, I first believed college students would be a good target audience for the information I’d like to share with my research. But college students already have strongly developed opinions, and this will miss many young adults who choose not to attend college. The type of information I’d like to share will have to do with the trust and openness in communication discussed in my research that has a possibility to help better hone diversity. Learning to do these things in groups may better prepare people for the world beyond their childhood homes. Because of this, and reconsidering, I decided this type of basic communication skill should be something taught to everyone, and at a young age, maybe as young as Elementary school. The research I’ve done, if it ever came to permanent findings for a solution to race conflict, could be developed into programs designed to help young children learn, understand and celebrate other’s differences.

Week of 7/13 Discussion

  1. “Skillfull,” linked in Alison Wynn’s Individual Change Won’t Create Gender Equality in Organizations, is an organization with the intent of connecting the 70% of Americans without college degrees with employers, educators and lawmakers based on skill sets. The website has resources for employers as well as the unemployed to get involved. What this adds to Wynn’s article is an outlet for the disparities she discussed to be helped. Women, or disadvantaged people can use this resource to pursue their endeavors.
  2. Her target audience in citing this website is women without college degrees. I gather this from the website’s mission statement which says, “Skillful works with employers, educators, policymakers and others to help the nearly 70% of Americans without college degrees get good jobs based on the skills they have or the skills they can learn – creating new opportunities for success in the digital era.” Wynn’s article is about a disparity of women in tech, and this linked article provides a resource for people without college degrees to get jobs in tech. Further, the website’s resources provide a place for women with a desire to get involved in tech to sign up, people who may have come straight from Wynn’s article.

Week of 7/6 Discussion

  1. Heterogeneity and team performance: Evaluating the effect of cultural diversity in the world’s top soccer league

In Heterogeneity and team performance: Evaluating the effect of cultural diversity in the world’s top soccer league, by Keith Ingersoll, Edmond Malesky and Sebastian M. Saiegh, the authors discuss a study in which the success of various professional soccer teams was analyzed on a premise of the level of diversity in each team. What they found was a positive relationship between diversity and performance. Teams with international talent on their roster outperform teams with a motivation towards cultivating “homegrown” (local) talent.

This source is extremely useful to my research because it brings the topic of diversity from within the realms of workplace structure, to the outside world, in the far reaches of professional international sports. This brings the topic from a small to very large scale, and opens up the possibility to relate the topic to other realms. By reaching to sports performance , something very different from office performance, it opens up all the places in between where there is room to look for connections between diversity and success. This article will work as a connection point from the workplace research to the larger world research.

2. In Readers Respond: Open Offices Are Terrible For Women, the women who respond build on the original ideas from the article. One women does this effectively by extending some of the original examples with her own experiences. She describes how she has been meaning to speak with her manager for a while now about a man who stares at her consistently and has caused her to take other routes throughout the office in order to avoid him. By illustrating her own experience she helps validate the original articles claims. I found her input interesting because it shed light on the feelings women have throughout their day while in an open office plan. The nature of many men cause them stress the men don’t ever have to bear. She furthers the point by adding that usually when women bring up issues like this their managers claim there is little they can do to fix it , and it has a negative impact on the worker who reported it and not the man.

Week of 6/29 Discussion

  1. Throughout this course so far we’ve read many contributions on the discussion of diversity, especially in the workplace. People make points for both the business and ethical effects of having more diversity in the workplace. In Wong’s, Culture: Equity and Inclusion, she adds to this conversation with her comparison of “equity vs. equality.” This is in the section titled “Equity vs. Equality.” Equality means everyone is treated the same, but this does not result in equity. Equity means a fair playing field. It is this particular point that Wong adds to the conversation of diversity we haven’t discussed thus far. It’s crucial to talk about how the time of this article’s release affects its contents. As the conversation around diversity progresses, more points like Wong’s are added to change what it means for a safe workplace for everyone.
  2. In chapter 8 of They Say, I Say, the authors employ a variety of techniques to make connections between different parts of a piece of writing. In Cori Wong’s article she uses some of these techniques herself, connecting part to part throughout the article. One example of this is in the following paragraph: “While diversity often refers to representation of difference, inclusion refers to how differences are meaningfully incorporated and integrated into daily practices. As such, a better way to frame the commitment to be more equitable and inclusive would start by asking, ‘Who is not represented at the proverbial table? In what ways have we kept some people out.'” She uses the beginning explaining a definition for diversity and uses the transition “as such,” to begin the next sentence in taking the definition elsewhere, asking a counter on top of it. This technique is effective because it ties two points together seamlessly. It informs the reader the next point is similar but different and will be adding a new thought on top of it.

Week of 6/22 Discussion

  1. One search tool that has worked well for me is the Syracuse Library Database search tool. Through this I was able to search by category and look in a specific realm of research. I was able to look at a whole pool of articles about organizational culture and workplace diversity. One roadblock in using this search tool was finding a lot of articles about the exact same thing. To get past this I had to search for specific topics, not the broad “organizational culture.” Before learning how to utilize Syracuse Library’s search tools, I would use google search and have an even broader range of results, with many articles again, coming up with the exact same thing, just due to google’s search algorithm.  Sometimes, with both methods, it takes searching some of the things I have questions about and not what I already know.
  2. Going forward into this research problem, my goal is dive more into the real-world applications of our findings from these articles. I want to find more cool and different ways some of these concepts apply. through this I hope to find primary sources that dive into the voices of minority members of corporations, institutions and societies. To find them I’ll continue using the SU library database search tools to find articles with new information. My goal is to find information completely different from what my classmates have found thus far, and really expand our canon when it comes to the topics we continue to discuss each week.

Week of 6/15 Discussion

  1. One article I found interesting in the class canon was Mike’s contribution, Exploring the Impact of Cultural Diversity on professional Football, by Keith Ingersoll, Edmond Malesky and Sebastian M. Saiegh. This contribution added to our class understanding of organizational culture and diversity because it adds the element of sport. The graphic he included really pushed the article’s point through, in showing how having players from different countries on a team contributed to the team’s success.

Another interesting contribution was Toni’s article,  Challenging the dialogic promise: how Ben & Jerry’s support for Black Lives Matter fosters dissensus on social media, by Erica Ciszek and Nneka Logan. What this piece adds to our class’s understanding is how social media and company’s influence impacts our culture when it comes to opinions on diversity. Toni included a screenshot of a tweet from Ben and Jerry’s, showing clearly a stance on the racism, specifically with the murder of George Floyd.

3. In The problem With Diversity in Computing, by Ian Bogost, he moves between paragraphs and sections smoothly, using transitions effectively. One example of this is when he moves from an overview of several experiences in the issues of diversity with computing, to a counter point. After finishing a story of Webb and her experience in the airport security, he begins the next paragraph with, “But that’s an aspirational hope.” This immediately has the text do a 180 and gets the readers refocused on a new direction the author takes them. He begins to explain the experience of Webb on a broader scale and takes his point to the real world. This transition is effective because it’s short and to the point. He doesn’t drag on the topic of Webb, but instead uses her experience as a boat to the next, more important point. Her experience leads into what it means for the rest of the world, but Bogost doesn’t waste time in switching to his main topic.

Week of 5/25 Discussion

  1. It has become common today to overlook the experiences of minorities in the workplace, something Gundemir details in The Impact of Organizational Diversity Policies on Minority Employees’ Leadership Self-Perceptions and Goals. However overlooked, these issues are as prevelant as the actual need for diversity corporations now call for in the workplace. 

I used the template in They Say, I Say that Graff and Birkenstein display as “It has become common today to dismiss ________.” I found this framing useful, because it’s more exciting than simply stating, “in this book *blank* says that *blank*”. Instead of this this overused way of framing common in high school English essays, the framing in TSIS does a better job of grabbing the audience’s attention and setting the tone for a less typical analysis we’re used to seeing. The framing I used not only introduces a section from the piece of writing, but brings a real world setting with it, using, “it has become common today to…”

2. Austin and Pisano and Gundemir’s ideas matter because they help piece together this bigger picture we have begun to discuss with diversity. They take different angles to what diversity means in the workplace. Diversity in the workplace has a ripple effect to both the success of the workplace and the outer sphere of society. Our readings have discussed how even in the earliest stages of diversity discussions with gifted programs in elementary schools, the lack of diversity has a ripple effect to the workplaces much further beyond that. A lack of diversity at the earliest level ripples into high school, college and eventually the workforce. Their ideas matter because they show once again the effect diverse people and ideas have on a institution, corporation or workforce. The impact of new and different ideas and techniques shows us again and again what diversity can do to help the success of any group.

Week of 5/18 Discussion

  1. This week’s readings have me eager to learn more about organizational culture and its impact in our society. It seems to be a blueprint for some, and a cancer to others. In what ways does organizational culture help success in an institution? In what ways does it harm success? Does it cultivate success for only some and the opposite for others? I’m interested in learning more about how an organizational culture came to be in our society, and how it didn’t in other societies. What is t that has society suddenly questioning our organizational default, and is it good or bad to begin to move away from it?
  2. “Organizational culture is the sum of values and rituals which serve as ‘glue’ to integrate the members of the organization.” — Richard Perrin

    Culture is a carrier of meaning. Cultures provide not only a shared view of “what is” but also of “why is.” In this view, culture is about “the story” in which people in the organization are embedded, and the values and rituals that reinforce that narrative. It also focuses attention on the importance of symbols and the need to understand them — including the idiosyncratic languages used in organizations — in order to understand culture.

    This definition can be misleading because it relates to the bad realm of organizational culture which attempts to force its parts in line and make them all similar, taking away their individuality. This goes away from a newer call for diversity within organizations, which has proven to bring great success. The idea of “reinforcing a narrative” does the opposite of this.

Bogost Rhetorical Moves

In Bogust’s, The Problem of Diversity in Computing, he uses many rhetorical moves to make his point. He starts with hug attention grabber for his audience with this quote: “When Amy Webb broke her ankle, she was forced to hobble around on a walking boot.” This is an alarming way to start an article but it grabs the attention of the audience. This introduction leads to a story about the women mentioned and her difficulties with metal scanners.

He uses this story to detail a problem to the audience that is with under-representation in the tech industry. He does this by relating her problem to others, and making it bigger; “Webb’s experience is among the more innocuous consequences of computer systems that don’t anticipate all the types of people who might use them.” By setting up a problem to the audience and making them aware of it, he makes them eager to listen to him for the answer.

After going into the issues of diversity, he brings up a counterpoint to further his own point’s credibility. To this counter-argument he says, “That idea echoes a popular suggestion to remedy computers’ ignorance of different sorts of people: Increase the diversity of representation among the people who make these systems, and they will serve the population better.” He follows this by saying, while this has merit, it is essentially wrong, and explains to his audience why. This again, helps with his credibility, by comparing and taking apart an argument opposite to his.

He does this again in his conclusion, relating all he’s talked about to a counterpoint that suggests all of this doesn’t relate to simply tech diversity, saying, “for years, companies and educators in the tech sector have framed diversity as a “pipeline” problem.” He moves into his conclusion strongly by showing how even his own points are sometimes attributed to some other cause. However he uses this as momentum to explain why that isn’t so, and why the real reason is the tech diversity.

At the very end he dials his point down to end the article in a way that brings up new questions. He says, “if she’s right, then the problem with computing isn’t just that it doesn’t represent a diverse public’s needs. Instead, the problem with computing is computing. By doing this he expands on his own points by suggesting the diversity might be deeper than just surface-level.